Feasibility Calculation
Case Study: Slopehelper vs. Conventional Machinery
Performance, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of Slopehelper
compared to conventional agricultural machinery.
General Parameters
|
2.40 |
|
300.00 |
|
4.20 |
|
50.00 |
|
350.00 |
|
146 |
|
10.50 |
|
44.00 |
|
1.20 |
|
0.20 |
|
1800.00 |
|
2400.00 |
|
8 |
|
15.00 |
Tractor Used in the Agricultural cycle
|
CHN industrial |
|
CN01 |
|
95000 |
|
120 |
|
15000 |
|
10000 |
Agrocycle Operations for Season
|
10 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
4 |
|
6 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
Slopehelper Feasibility
Conventional Agrosystem Annual Costs
(€/year)
|
28510.19 |
Slopehelper Agrosystem Annual Costs
(€/year)
|
8760.72 |
Conventional Agrosystem Annual Costs
(€/(year * ha))
|
2715.26 |
Slopehelper Agrosystem Annual Costs
(€/(year * ha))
|
834.35 |
Annual CO₂ Emissions Reduction After Switching to Slopehelper Agrosystem
(kg/year)
|
18401.00 |
Average Slopehelper Agrosystem Efficiency
|
325% |