Feasibility Calculation
Case Study: Slopehelper vs. Conventional Machinery
Performance, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of Slopehelper
compared to conventional agricultural machinery.
General Parameters
|
|
3.50 |
|
|
300.00 |
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
50.00 |
|
|
350.00 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
10.50 |
|
|
30.00 |
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
1800.00 |
|
|
2400.00 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
15.00 |
Tractor Used in the Agricultural cycle
|
|
CHN industrial |
|
|
CN01 |
|
|
95000 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
15000 |
|
|
10000 |
Agrocycle Operations for Season
|
|
10 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
Active Side Trimmer
|
4 |
|
U-shaped cutter
|
2 |
Slopehelper Feasibility
|
|
22987.73 |
|
|
7865.33 |
|
|
2189.31 |
|
|
749.08 |
|
|
15042.87 |
|
|
292% |